🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible in which election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year went for Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does so afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on the island with a high participation. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. Thus there was some opposition. However overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.