🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a newly configured congressional map that could add up to five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 decision, handed down on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to overturn a district court's injunction that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and disrupting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its ruling.

The district court had previously found that Texas had probably classified voters based on their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to use the boundaries created after the 2020 census for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

Through a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She argued that it disregarded the work of the district court, observing that its decision was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its increased favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Battle

The ruling occurs during a national fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican hold. Usually, boundary revision takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, for their part, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

On the other hand, opposition party leaders lamented the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic leader said the court had another time eroded its credibility by approving a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.